This is a read only archive of pad.okfn.org. See the shutdown announcement for details.

•     To identify what we need to know, and what tools we need to effectively do an global review of Open Access next year

• 1) Intro
• 2) Post-it note exersize to get a overview of what we know, what we need to konw
• 3) Breakout exersize with discussion of tools to get/use data
• 4) Feedback
• 5) How we're going to take this forwards

• How can be demonstrate the benefits of different licenses 
• cwijes@cit-ec.uni-bieiefeld.de
•  

• ·      An.schrijvers@vrwi.be
• ·      Stephanie.dawson@scienceopen.com
• ·      scilib@gmail.com
• ·      (Catriona PLOS)
• ·      Peter
• ·      Joe 
• ·      Laurence.bianchini@mysciencework.com
• ·      joao.martins@snf.ch
• ·      lucy.patterson@mdc-berlin.de 
•  

• ·      Tom.olijhoek@gmail.com   
• ·      joona.lehtomaki@gmail.com
• ·      joao.martins@snf.ch
• ·      Laurence.bianchini@mysciencework.com (mainly to follow the discussions and exchanges I guess)
• # 3a Cost of open access
• This could be tied to the above idea
• ·      Catroina 

• ·      l.c.a.verstappen@rug.nl (point to Stephanie.dawson@scienceopen.com)
• ·      Daniel wants to be connected with above. He’s also starting a journal. Contact details are Daniel.huerlimann@unilu.ch
• General info: Lucy Patterson lucy.patterson@mdc-berlin.de 

• Need to centralise info on what is actually happening. 

• Libraries and funders[1] should publish data about how much the pay for CA works, and how large their OA funds are as Open Data[2]
• 
  
• Break down of figures:
• total money
•   OA money
•   CA money 
•  
• OA by license
•   CC-0
•   CC-BY
•   CC-BY-SA
•   CC-BY-NC
•   homegrown
• 
  
• OA by type of work
•   articles
•   books
•  
• OA by area
•   sciences
•   humanities
• 
  
• German collection of repositories
• 
  
• A German collection including size of each repository can be found here:
•     http://www.base-search.net/about/de/about_de_sources_date_dn.php?menu=2&submenu=1
•     
• [1] 
• DFG
• helmholtz
• leibniz
• mpi
• fraunhofer
• 
  
• [2]Bielefeld University has recently started to release author processing charges paid by article undr an Open Database Licence:
•     
• http://njahn82.github.io/unibiAPC/
• 
  
• A foodle organises a video conference to get involved more unis and libraries
• 
  
• https://terminplaner.dfn.de/foodle.php?id=zn55qyg75smfj69q

• Open up process of submission process, peer review process - to be more transparent
• 
  
• From the Policy side, costs are helpful in steering policy decisions
• - University subscription costs
• - Opening up publisher contracts
• - How much is being spent on Gold/Green OA 
• 
  
• From the researcher side
• Opening up code that underlies the article,
• How article is tracked? Is the data being cited?
•  citations per work Gold vs. Green

• More basic problems than subscriptions costs or publication fees
• * Plagiarism (esp. amongst students, theses)
• * Researchers don't even publish
• * Value of knowledge is perceived to be low
• * No open access policies in some places
• * No metadata online

• Movement of faculty to willingly adpt OA policies and then can start collecting data. Need people to motivate and share best practise
• Information on figures of less interest to researchers - need to know what others have done and what works and doesn't
•