This is a read only archive of pad.okfn.org. See the shutdown announcement for details.

• Konrad Förstner (@konradfoerstner)
• Andreas Leimbach (@aleimba)
• Markus Ankenbrand (@iimog)

• What is Open Science: http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2016-what-is-open-science.html
• How open science helps researchers succeed: https://elifesciences.org/content/5/e16800
• "Come In, We’re Open: The Changing Culture of Research": http://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/handle/1912/8045
• Mailing lists
• [en] https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/
• [de] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science-de

• Konrad Förstner (@konradfoerstner)
• Andreas Leimbach (@aleimba)
• Markus Ankenbrand (@iimog)
• André Gaul (@andrenarchy)
• Paul Seyfert (pseyfert@cern.ch)
• @mneuschaefer
• Fabian Klötzl (@kloetzl)
• Bernd Rupp (@bernd_rupp) 
• Thorsten Rissom (rissom@posteo.de)
• Nikola Wachter (nikola.wachter@ei-ie.org,  www.ei-ie.org/ Global Federation of Education Unions, interested in insights on EU copyrights reform, campaigns againgst Elsevier, and show how little services publishers actually offer)
• Mark C. (@LargeCardinal) - Scouse Mathematician 
• @hexmasteen - University IT Guy
• David Hofmann (@emory.edu - from the "Mittelbauinitiative Gute Arbeit in der Wissenschaft" http://mittelbau.net/) 
• Olga Gkotsopoulou (@Olga_Gkotso, olga_gk@fsfe.org  - FSFE's Free Software and Open Standards position paper: https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170105-01.en.html )
• Your name if you like.
• ...

• Introduction round

• ~40 (growing to ~45)
• ~30 from germany, ~13 from (non-german) europe

• scientists: 30
• citizen sci: 5
• interested: 5

• life sciences: 10
• physics: 9
• chemistry: 1
• math: 2
• architect: 1
• humanities: 5
• engineers: 4

• lots of PhD, some postdocs, no prof

• most have rough idea

• clustering by field

• Publication
• Open Access
• Still money involved: APCs (author pays), (university) publishers are funded by DFG et al.
• Repositories usually don't do peer review
• Diamond/Golden/Green Open Access
• publishers add reputation (we can not replace that immediately)
• Strategy: transform existing journals into OA journals (or create a new one and migrate editors)
• rebel OA: scihub
• with scihub: is OA still the top priority or should we focus more on other aspects (e.g. Open Data)?
• scihub does not solve license problem (reusability)
• building open access infrastructure
• Open source code
• Open Licenses
• Zenodo
• How extensively to document? At least good enough for your future self (in 1 or 2 years).
• Education (Software/Data Carpentry)
• Preprints
• arXiv (arxiv.org), biorxiv (biorxiv.org), socarxiv (socopen.org)
• fear of getting scooped (in life science)
• overlay journals 
• Preregistration (fight reproducibility crisis)
• Open data
• huge datasets in high energy particle physics
• privacy issues
• Open Licenses
• Zenodo https://zenodo.org/
• figshare https://figshare.com/
• Is there a way to ensure that all derived data is open? (GPL-like)
• in most cases no copyright on data possible
• Funders require OA publications
• Legal issues: EU copyright reform could result in problems for repositories and platforms using content
• negative results (journnal of negative results in biomedicine https://jnrbm.biomedcentral.com/ )
• Open Peer Review
• https://reviewqualitycollector.org/  however, not sure whether the plattform is FLOSS :/
• Metrics
• Impact factor
• Altmetrics: https://www.altmetric.com/, Publons
• WikiCite (not a metric, attempt to make citation data publicly available)
• Discoverability
• Communication to public
• Citability (doi for everything)
• Machine readability (Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) Standard)
• Funding
• depends on publications
• Idea
• Data generation
• Reproducibility
• 
  
• Data analysis
• Reproducibility
• Frameworks for exact reproduction (using virtualization, docker)
• used tools are not open (software, devices)
• Open Notebook
• jupyter (interactive notebook, literate programming, json format)
• Reputation
• metrics: altmetrics
• credit for peer review: publons
• credit for reproducing other peoples work? ReScience http://rescience.github.io/
• credit for reproducibility (badges, Open Research Framework )
• ORCID http://orcid.org/
• PaperHive https://paperhive.org/ – annotate publications, collaborative reading
• PubPeer https://pubpeer.com/ – comments 
• 
  
• Open Practices in science education and teaching
• experiences / projects?
• Citizen Science
• biotinkering
• Infrastructure
• Open Journal Systems by PKP, https://pkp.sfu.ca/

• As peer reviewer you can ask authors to comply with standards
• Talk about this stuff
• Sessions like this at local institutions
• Ask students to do a replication study (as a supervisor)
• Make students aware of the whole topic as early as possible (as a supervisor)
• Ask people applying for a position to make a statement about Open Science
• Training (Hackathons, Software/Data/Library Carpentry, dfg is spending on Personalentwicklung)
• Ask your Local Infrastructure Person (there is one at almost every place)
• Support SciHub
• Collect success stories / failure stories
• List of best (good enough) practices (OpenScience 101)
• Use momentum (e.g. boycott of Elsevier)
• Constant pressure
• Get people that are open into positions of power (e.g. professorships)
• Use test balloon projects by funders (e.g. suftware sustainability funding by dfg)
• Join like-minded people (calls, mailing lists, organizations)