This is a read only archive of pad.okfn.org. See the
shutdown announcement
for details.
Open_Education_Working_Friday_Chats
Open Education Working Group Friday Chats
This etherpad is a place to drop in ideas for discussion topics for the Open education Working Group mailing list (http://education.okfn.org/mailing-list/) for a Friday Chat. The results of the chats will be tidied up and added to the Open education Handbook: http://education.okfn.org/handbook/
Dates
25 April - Breaking down OER & accessibility
2 May - what is openness to you?
9 May - open education data
16 May -
23 May - What are the differences between open (as in access) or open (as in participatory & contribution)? Which is the most important? Have we focused too much on access? - from a discussion on the open design list
30 May - open education data
6 June - Is traditional education not open?
13 June - none
20 June - do we need open policy?
27 June - open education and privacy
4 July - Import lessons - how do you rebuild OER - tools
25 july Database of Open Education Courses
22 August - Is there still an OER movement?
5th September - What can the open education 'movement' and open education working group learn from other movements and working groups?
12th September - people's personal experiences of MOOCs. Do we practice what we preach? Or are MOOCs just something we deliver for other people? do you use MOOCs to support what you do? Have people had positive
experiences connecting with communities in MOOCs? What about hybrid approaches - has anyone participated in a MOOC and at the same time been involved in a physical community supporting it? Are there people delivering MOOCs who fundamentally disagree with them as a form of open education?
19 September - Quantified student
26 September - Privacy and open education continued...
3rd October
Recently had a great workshop in London on privacy and open data. The mydata/open data working group has been thinking about the various topics here too, where open information connects with privacy and personal data topics, eg:
* opening up quantified self data about yourself and/or collected yourself
* privacy with respect to government data collection
* openness of public records including data about specific individuals
* privacy around personal data in scientific and medical research
* open information about topics related to privacy or personal information, for instance, open data about what information is collected or how information is handled by institutions
Ideas - borrowed from Altc sig
Discoverability of OER – How are they signposted? How can we find them?
· Open advocacy – Why should we be ‘open’? Why use Creative Commons?
o This could possibly feed into a webinar on ‘CC for Dummies’
· Institutional control of IP and copyright
· How to engage senior management when it comes to openness and OER
o Open Policy (bottom up rather than top down)
o Barriers to open
· Possibility of setting up a workshop for newcomers to the open/OER world
o Call for guidance and services
o This can become a resource for future reference
· Reusing and repurposing
o When reuse becomes a barrier
o There are many case studies for reuse; we should aggregate them and create a directory
· The relationship between OER and MOOCs
o Why MOOCs and not OER?
· Open16 – volunteers to host required!
Questions/Topics
Please add ideas below and we will allocate them a date
- Is traditional education not open?
- What affect does open education have on education?
- Who is meant to benefit from open education?
- Must a resource be in an open format to be open?
- Is a MOOC an OER?
- What examples of open learning and practice methods are there?
- What is the difference between open education and open learning?
- What is open education data?
- What open source open education tools are there?
- Pre-standardisation - mutual relationship between open data, open education and open standards
- How to become sustainable? / Open business models
Discussion around Ways to Chat & Discuss
Fred: I like this idea a lot. I was also briefly part of a scholarly
reading group based on openness that used Google +, but never really got off the ground. The idea there was to propose a research paper and collaboratively read and discuss it via a Google hangout. I think it is a great idea and one I would like to resurrect once I finish with school.
I would love to take part in discussions around the very questions you asked below, but would recommend considering starting off with a more generic “what is openness to you” type question. For me personally, this list at times seems very focused on OER, which is not something I am into. However, creating a dialogue about the nature and application of openness is something I think could lead to many interesting conversations. I would love to discuss where everyone stands on openness and learn more about how we think of it impacting our professional roles.
I also think Fridays are as good a time as any.
Tom: I think building discussions would be a great idea. Although email
newsletters are not ideal for discussion they are very effective for
keeping up to date with a lot of different strands of work that may or
may not build into a conversation at times.
I would say that in order to help create more discussion it would be
useful to try to create a schedule for the conversations, or a calendar.
One with a few topics in advance that people have expressed an interest
to discuss.
We could have it as an open Google doc to be edited and topics can be
added, or with a survey online via email.
The questions from the Handbook look exactly like the kind of questions
that would be well suited for a tweetchat on a topic. So that is another
possible way to discuss ideas with tweets.
I am a fan of silent Etherpading. Just saying that one Friday is the day
to drop some ideas onto an Etherpad and drop the questions onto it too
(sending out the link on Friday). Then you can have a dedicated time
organised to chat using the Etherpad chat function alongside. It is
possible to talk also using Vidyo http://www.vidyo.com/ if you want to
have a face to face alongside the Etherpad.
I like the idea of a fun Friday meeting, and it is always good to spread
the discussion out in ways that it can be accessible both by people
afterwards and also by people on twitter or just in text format or later
on using the Etherpad.
It is also easy to annotate an Etherpad and to add to ideas people have
already put down synchronously or asynchronously.
Andre: I'd opt for exporting calendar events as .ics
(https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/exporting-and-sharing-a-calendar#w_exporting-a-calendar-under-thunderbird-and-lightning)
and share them as attachment. Alternatively, it should be doable to
setup a WebDAV server on okfn.org (could you ask the technical teams,
Marieke)?
I won't follow links to Google Doc. Sorry. On the one hand it's the
wrong tool for it, on the other hand it's from Google. I'm pushing hard
to reduce my dependency from big companies.
Vidyo is proprietary and not available for my distro, though there's a
GNU/Linux binary, but it is Ubuntu-only.
Etherpad is not accessible for screenreaders (iframe in an iframe and
much JavaScript magic). Sadly. I don't have an alternative at hand either.
Claude: Andre, your point about accessibility for screenreaders is really important. Shouldn't access for all also be addressed in the handbook itself?
Also accessibility of multimedia.
However, concerning this Etherpad, I don't have a screenreader, but the Fangs screenreader emulating addon for Firefox - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fangs-screen-reader-emulator/ - does show the whole content of this pad. Is Fangs wrong?